infrastructure/mox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/mjl-/mox.git synced 2025-07-10 09:54:40 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

add scram-sha-256 for smtp

Browse Source 
similar to imap. the code should be merged.
this also reads the abort-line after authentication failure.
This commit is contained in:
Mechiel Lukkien
2023-01-31 00:22:26 +01:00
parent b40bb257d7
commit 020d0bb0fb
5 changed files with 128 additions and 17 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

114
smtpserver/server.go
View File

@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ import (
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus"
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promauto"
"github.com/mjl-/bstore"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/config"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/dkim"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/dmarc"
@ -36,6 +38,7 @@ import (
"github.com/mjl-/mox/moxvar"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/publicsuffix"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/queue"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/scram"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/smtp"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/spf"
"github.com/mjl-/mox/store"
@ -659,10 +662,9 @@ func (c *conn) cmdHello(p *parser, ehlo bool) {
c.bwritelinef("250-STARTTLS")
}
if c.submission {
// todo future: implement SCRAM-SHA-256.
// ../rfc/4954:123
if c.tls || !c.requireTLSForAuth {
c.bwritelinef("250-AUTH PLAIN")
c.bwritelinef("250-AUTH PLAIN SCRAM-SHA-256")
} else {
c.bwritelinef("250-AUTH ")
}
@ -757,16 +759,8 @@ func (c *conn) cmdAuth(p *parser) {
// ../rfc/4954:699
p.xspace()
mech := p.xsaslMech()
switch mech {
case "PLAIN":
authVariant = "plain"
// ../rfc/4954:343
// ../rfc/4954:326
if !c.tls && c.requireTLSForAuth {
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C538EncReqForAuth, smtp.SePol7EncReqForAuth11, "authentication requires tls")
}
xreadInitial := func() []byte {
var auth string
if p.empty() {
c.writelinef("%d ", smtp.C334ContinueAuth) // ../rfc/4954:205
@ -793,6 +787,34 @@ func (c *conn) cmdAuth(p *parser) {
// ../rfc/4954:235
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C501BadParamSyntax, smtp.SeProto5Syntax2, "invalid base64: %s", err)
}
return buf
}
xreadContinuation := func() []byte {
line := c.readline()
if line == "*" {
authResult = "aborted"
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C501BadParamSyntax, smtp.SeProto5Other0, "authentication aborted")
}
buf, err := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(line)
if err != nil {
// ../rfc/4954:235
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C501BadParamSyntax, smtp.SeProto5Syntax2, "invalid base64: %s", err)
}
return buf
}
switch mech {
case "PLAIN":
authVariant = "plain"
// ../rfc/4954:343
// ../rfc/4954:326
if !c.tls && c.requireTLSForAuth {
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C538EncReqForAuth, smtp.SePol7EncReqForAuth11, "authentication requires tls")
}
buf := xreadInitial()
plain := bytes.Split(buf, []byte{0})
if len(plain) != 3 {
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C501BadParamSyntax, smtp.SeProto5BadParams4, "auth data should have 3 nul-separated tokens, got %d", len(plain))
@ -819,6 +841,76 @@ func (c *conn) cmdAuth(p *parser) {
// ../rfc/4954:276
c.writecodeline(smtp.C235AuthSuccess, smtp.SePol7Other0, "nice", nil)
case "SCRAM-SHA-256":
// todo: improve handling of errors during scram. e.g. invalid parameters. should we abort the imap command, or continue until the end and respond with a scram-level error?
// todo: use single implementation between ../imapserver/server.go and ../smtpserver/server.go
authVariant = "scram-sha-256"
c0 := xreadInitial()
ss, err := scram.NewServer(c0)
xcheckf(err, "starting scram")
c.log.Info("scram auth", mlog.Field("authentication", ss.Authentication))
acc, _, err := store.OpenEmail(ss.Authentication)
if err != nil {
// todo: we could continue scram with a generated salt, deterministically generated
// from the username. that way we don't have to store anything but attackers cannot
// learn if an account exists. same for absent scram saltedpassword below.
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C454TempAuthFail, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "scram not possible")
}
defer func() {
if acc != nil {
err := acc.Close()
if err != nil {
c.log.Errorx("closing account", err)
}
}
}()
if ss.Authorization != "" && ss.Authorization != ss.Authentication {
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C535AuthBadCreds, smtp.SePol7AuthBadCreds8, "authentication with authorization for different user not supported")
}
var password store.Password
acc.WithRLock(func() {
err := acc.DB.Read(func(tx *bstore.Tx) error {
password, err = bstore.QueryTx[store.Password](tx).Get()
xsc := password.SCRAMSHA256
if err == bstore.ErrAbsent || err == nil && (len(xsc.Salt) == 0 || xsc.Iterations == 0 || len(xsc.SaltedPassword) == 0) {
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C454TempAuthFail, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "scram not possible")
}
xcheckf(err, "fetching credentials")
return err
})
xcheckf(err, "read tx")
})
s1, err := ss.ServerFirst(password.SCRAMSHA256.Iterations, password.SCRAMSHA256.Salt)
xcheckf(err, "scram first server step")
c.writelinef("%d %s", smtp.C334ContinueAuth, base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString([]byte(s1))) // ../rfc/4954:187
c2 := xreadContinuation()
s3, err := ss.Finish(c2, password.SCRAMSHA256.SaltedPassword)
if len(s3) > 0 {
c.writelinef("%d %s", smtp.C334ContinueAuth, base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString([]byte(s3))) // ../rfc/4954:187
}
if err != nil {
c.readline() // Should be "*" for cancellation.
if errors.Is(err, scram.ErrInvalidProof) {
authResult = "badcreds"
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C535AuthBadCreds, smtp.SePol7AuthBadCreds8, "bad credentials")
}
xcheckf(err, "server final")
}
// Client must still respond, but there is nothing to say. See ../rfc/9051:6221
// The message should be empty. todo: should we require it is empty?
xreadContinuation()
authResult = "ok"
c.authFailed = 0
c.account = acc
acc = nil // Cancel cleanup.
c.username = ss.Authentication
// ../rfc/4954:276
c.writecodeline(smtp.C235AuthSuccess, smtp.SePol7Other0, "nice", nil)
default:
// todo future: implement scram-sha-256 ../rfc/7677
// todo future: possibly implement cram-md5, at least where we allow PLAIN. ../rfc/4954:348