mirror of
https://github.com/mjl-/mox.git
synced 2025-07-12 13:44:37 +03:00
add support for SCRAM-SHA-1
the idea is that clients may not support SCRAM-SHA-256, but may support SCRAM-SHA-1. if they do support the 256 variant, they'll use it. unfortunately, thunderbird does not support scram-sha-1 either.
This commit is contained in:
@ -6,10 +6,13 @@ import (
|
||||
"bytes"
|
||||
"context"
|
||||
"crypto/rsa"
|
||||
"crypto/sha1"
|
||||
"crypto/sha256"
|
||||
"crypto/tls"
|
||||
"encoding/base64"
|
||||
"errors"
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
"hash"
|
||||
"io"
|
||||
"net"
|
||||
"os"
|
||||
@ -679,7 +682,7 @@ func (c *conn) cmdHello(p *parser, ehlo bool) {
|
||||
if c.submission {
|
||||
// ../rfc/4954:123
|
||||
if c.tls || !c.requireTLSForAuth {
|
||||
c.bwritelinef("250-AUTH PLAIN SCRAM-SHA-256")
|
||||
c.bwritelinef("250-AUTH PLAIN SCRAM-SHA-256 SCRAM-SHA-1")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
c.bwritelinef("250-AUTH ")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -861,16 +864,22 @@ func (c *conn) cmdAuth(p *parser) {
|
||||
// ../rfc/4954:276
|
||||
c.writecodeline(smtp.C235AuthSuccess, smtp.SePol7Other0, "nice", nil)
|
||||
|
||||
case "SCRAM-SHA-256":
|
||||
case "SCRAM-SHA-1", "SCRAM-SHA-256":
|
||||
// todo: improve handling of errors during scram. e.g. invalid parameters. should we abort the imap command, or continue until the end and respond with a scram-level error?
|
||||
// todo: use single implementation between ../imapserver/server.go and ../smtpserver/server.go
|
||||
|
||||
authVariant = "scram-sha-256"
|
||||
authVariant = strings.ToLower(mech)
|
||||
var h func() hash.Hash
|
||||
if authVariant == "scram-sha-1" {
|
||||
h = sha1.New
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
h = sha256.New
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Passwords cannot be retrieved or replayed from the trace.
|
||||
|
||||
c0 := xreadInitial()
|
||||
ss, err := scram.NewServer(c0)
|
||||
ss, err := scram.NewServer(h, c0)
|
||||
xcheckf(err, "starting scram")
|
||||
c.log.Info("scram auth", mlog.Field("authentication", ss.Authentication))
|
||||
acc, _, err := store.OpenEmail(ss.Authentication)
|
||||
@ -891,12 +900,16 @@ func (c *conn) cmdAuth(p *parser) {
|
||||
if ss.Authorization != "" && ss.Authorization != ss.Authentication {
|
||||
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C535AuthBadCreds, smtp.SePol7AuthBadCreds8, "authentication with authorization for different user not supported")
|
||||
}
|
||||
var password store.Password
|
||||
var xscram store.SCRAM
|
||||
acc.WithRLock(func() {
|
||||
err := acc.DB.Read(func(tx *bstore.Tx) error {
|
||||
password, err = bstore.QueryTx[store.Password](tx).Get()
|
||||
xsc := password.SCRAMSHA256
|
||||
if err == bstore.ErrAbsent || err == nil && (len(xsc.Salt) == 0 || xsc.Iterations == 0 || len(xsc.SaltedPassword) == 0) {
|
||||
password, err := bstore.QueryTx[store.Password](tx).Get()
|
||||
if authVariant == "scram-sha-1" {
|
||||
xscram = password.SCRAMSHA1
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
xscram = password.SCRAMSHA256
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err == bstore.ErrAbsent || err == nil && (len(xscram.Salt) == 0 || xscram.Iterations == 0 || len(xscram.SaltedPassword) == 0) {
|
||||
xsmtpUserErrorf(smtp.C454TempAuthFail, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "scram not possible")
|
||||
}
|
||||
xcheckf(err, "fetching credentials")
|
||||
@ -904,11 +917,11 @@ func (c *conn) cmdAuth(p *parser) {
|
||||
})
|
||||
xcheckf(err, "read tx")
|
||||
})
|
||||
s1, err := ss.ServerFirst(password.SCRAMSHA256.Iterations, password.SCRAMSHA256.Salt)
|
||||
s1, err := ss.ServerFirst(xscram.Iterations, xscram.Salt)
|
||||
xcheckf(err, "scram first server step")
|
||||
c.writelinef("%d %s", smtp.C334ContinueAuth, base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString([]byte(s1))) // ../rfc/4954:187
|
||||
c2 := xreadContinuation()
|
||||
s3, err := ss.Finish(c2, password.SCRAMSHA256.SaltedPassword)
|
||||
s3, err := ss.Finish(c2, xscram.SaltedPassword)
|
||||
if len(s3) > 0 {
|
||||
c.writelinef("%d %s", smtp.C334ContinueAuth, base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString([]byte(s3))) // ../rfc/4954:187
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user