implement outgoing dmarc aggregate reporting

in smtpserver, we store dmarc evaluations (under the right conditions).
in dmarcdb, we periodically (hourly) send dmarc reports if there are
evaluations. for failed deliveries, we deliver the dsn quietly to a submailbox
of the postmaster mailbox.

this is on by default, but can be disabled in mox.conf.
This commit is contained in:
Mechiel Lukkien
2023-11-01 17:55:40 +01:00
parent d1e93020d8
commit e7699708ef
40 changed files with 2689 additions and 245 deletions

View File

@ -37,16 +37,17 @@ type delivery struct {
}
type analysis struct {
accept bool
mailbox string
code int
secode string
userError bool
errmsg string
err error // For our own logging, not sent to remote.
dmarcReport *dmarcrpt.Feedback // Validated dmarc aggregate report, not yet stored.
tlsReport *tlsrpt.Report // Validated TLS report, not yet stored.
reason string // If non-empty, reason for this decision. Can be one of reputationMethod and a few other tokens.
accept bool
mailbox string
code int
secode string
userError bool
errmsg string
err error // For our own logging, not sent to remote.
dmarcReport *dmarcrpt.Feedback // Validated DMARC aggregate report, not yet stored.
tlsReport *tlsrpt.Report // Validated TLS report, not yet stored.
reason string // If non-empty, reason for this decision. Can be one of reputationMethod and a few other tokens.
dmarcOverrideReason string // If set, one of dmarcrpt.PolicyOverride
}
const (
@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ const (
reasonDNSBlocklisted = "dns-blocklisted"
reasonSubjectpass = "subjectpass"
reasonSubjectpassError = "subjectpass-error"
reasonIPrev = "iprev" // No or mil junk reputation signals, and bad iprev.
reasonIPrev = "iprev" // No or mild junk reputation signals, and bad iprev.
)
func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delivery) analysis {
@ -83,15 +84,17 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
ld := rs.ListAllowDNSDomain
// todo: on temporary failures, reject temporarily?
if d.m.MailFromValidated && ld.Name() == d.m.MailFromDomain {
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonListAllow}
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonListAllow, dmarcOverrideReason: string(dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideMailingList)}
}
for _, r := range d.dkimResults {
if r.Status == dkim.StatusPass && r.Sig.Domain == ld {
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonListAllow}
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonListAllow, dmarcOverrideReason: string(dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideMailingList)}
}
}
}
var dmarcOverrideReason string
// For forwarded messages, we have different junk analysis. We don't reject for
// failing DMARC, and we clear fields that could implicate the forwarding mail
// server during future classifications on incoming messages (the forwarding mail
@ -113,6 +116,7 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
}
}
d.m.DKIMDomains = dkimdoms
dmarcOverrideReason = string(dmarcrpt.PolicyOverrideForwarded)
log.Info("forwarded message, clearing identifying signals of forwarding mail server")
}
@ -154,7 +158,7 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
})
})
if mberr != nil {
return analysis{false, mailbox, smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, false, "error processing", err, nil, nil, reasonReputationError}
return analysis{false, mailbox, smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, false, "error processing", err, nil, nil, reasonReputationError, dmarcOverrideReason}
}
d.m.MailboxID = 0 // We plan to reject, no need to set intended MailboxID.
}
@ -168,7 +172,7 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
d.m.Seen = true
log.Info("accepting reject to configured mailbox due to ruleset")
}
return analysis{accept, mailbox, code, secode, err == nil, errmsg, err, nil, nil, reason}
return analysis{accept, mailbox, code, secode, err == nil, errmsg, err, nil, nil, reason, dmarcOverrideReason}
}
if d.dmarcUse && d.dmarcResult.Reject {
@ -180,17 +184,17 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
// track of the report. We'll check reputation, defaulting to accept.
var dmarcReport *dmarcrpt.Feedback
if d.rcptAcc.destination.DMARCReports {
// Messages with DMARC aggregate reports must have a dmarc pass. ../rfc/7489:1866
// Messages with DMARC aggregate reports must have a DMARC pass. ../rfc/7489:1866
if d.dmarcResult.Status != dmarc.StatusPass {
log.Info("received dmarc report without dmarc pass, not processing as dmarc report")
log.Info("received dmarc aggregate report without dmarc pass, not processing as dmarc report")
} else if report, err := dmarcrpt.ParseMessageReport(log, store.FileMsgReader(d.m.MsgPrefix, d.dataFile)); err != nil {
log.Infox("parsing dmarc report", err)
log.Infox("parsing dmarc aggregate report", err)
} else if d, err := dns.ParseDomain(report.PolicyPublished.Domain); err != nil {
log.Infox("parsing domain in dmarc report", err)
log.Infox("parsing domain in dmarc aggregate report", err)
} else if _, ok := mox.Conf.Domain(d); !ok {
log.Info("dmarc report for domain not configured, ignoring", mlog.Field("domain", d))
log.Info("dmarc aggregate report for domain not configured, ignoring", mlog.Field("domain", d))
} else if report.ReportMetadata.DateRange.End > time.Now().Unix()+60 {
log.Info("dmarc report with end date in the future, ignoring", mlog.Field("domain", d), mlog.Field("end", time.Unix(report.ReportMetadata.DateRange.End, 0)))
log.Info("dmarc aggregate report with end date in the future, ignoring", mlog.Field("domain", d), mlog.Field("end", time.Unix(report.ReportMetadata.DateRange.End, 0)))
} else {
dmarcReport = report
}
@ -261,12 +265,12 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
log.Info("reputation analyzed", mlog.Field("conclusive", conclusive), mlog.Field("isjunk", isjunk), mlog.Field("method", string(method)))
if conclusive {
if !*isjunk {
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, dmarcReport: dmarcReport, tlsReport: tlsReport, reason: reason}
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, dmarcReport: dmarcReport, tlsReport: tlsReport, reason: reason, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
}
return reject(smtp.C451LocalErr, smtp.SeSys3Other0, "error processing", err, string(method))
} else if dmarcReport != nil || tlsReport != nil {
log.Info("accepting dmarc reporting or tlsrpt message without reputation")
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, dmarcReport: dmarcReport, tlsReport: tlsReport, reason: reasonReporting}
log.Info("accepting message with dmarc aggregate report or tls report without reputation")
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, dmarcReport: dmarcReport, tlsReport: tlsReport, reason: reasonReporting, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
}
// If there was no previous message from sender or its domain, and we have an SPF
// (soft)fail, reject the message.
@ -302,7 +306,7 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
pass := err == nil
log.Infox("pass by subject token", err, mlog.Field("pass", pass))
if pass {
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonSubjectpass}
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonSubjectpass, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
}
}
@ -382,7 +386,7 @@ func analyze(ctx context.Context, log *mlog.Log, resolver dns.Resolver, d delive
}
if accept {
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonNoBadSignals}
return analysis{accept: true, mailbox: mailbox, reason: reasonNoBadSignals, dmarcOverrideReason: dmarcOverrideReason}
}
if subjectpassKey != "" && d.dmarcResult.Status == dmarc.StatusPass && method == methodNone && (dnsblocklisted || junkSubjectpass) {