2014-11-27 18:27:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Do not edit this file. It was automatically generated. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef HEADER_Platform
|
|
|
|
#define HEADER_Platform
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2014-11-27 21:33:37 +00:00
|
|
|
htop - freebsd/Platform.h
|
2014-11-27 18:27:34 +00:00
|
|
|
(C) 2014 Hisham H. Muhammad
|
|
|
|
Released under the GNU GPL, see the COPYING file
|
|
|
|
in the source distribution for its full text.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "Action.h"
|
2014-11-27 23:07:42 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "BatteryMeter.h"
|
2015-10-19 19:22:54 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "SignalsPanel.h"
|
2014-11-27 18:27:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-16 06:13:42 +00:00
|
|
|
extern ProcessFieldData Process_fields[];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce CLAMP macro. Unify all MIN(MAX(a,b),c) uses.
With the CLAMP macro replacing the combination of MIN and MAX, we will
have at least two advantages:
1. It's more obvious semantically.
2. There are no more mixes of confusing uses like MIN(MAX(a,b),c) and
MAX(MIN(a,b),c) and MIN(a,MAX(b,c)) appearing everywhere. We unify
the 'clamping' with a single macro.
Note that the behavior of this CLAMP macro is different from
the combination `MAX(low,MIN(x,high))`.
* This CLAMP macro expands to two comparisons instead of three from
MAX and MIN combination. In theory, this makes the code slightly
smaller, in case that (low) or (high) or both are computed at
runtime, so that compilers cannot optimize them. (The third
comparison will matter if (low)>(high); see below.)
* CLAMP has a side effect, that if (low)>(high) it will produce weird
results. Unlike MIN & MAX which will force either (low) or (high) to
win. No assertion of ((low)<=(high)) is done in this macro, for now.
This CLAMP macro is implemented like described in glib
<http://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Standard-Macros.html>
and does not handle weird uses like CLAMP(a++, low++, high--) .
2016-01-15 12:26:01 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifndef CLAMP
|
|
|
|
#define CLAMP(x,low,high) (((x)>(high))?(high):(((x)<(low))?(low):(x)))
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-16 06:13:42 +00:00
|
|
|
extern ProcessField Platform_defaultFields[];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern int Platform_numberOfFields;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-30 12:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
extern const SignalItem Platform_signals[];
|
2015-10-19 19:22:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-30 12:41:17 +00:00
|
|
|
extern const unsigned int Platform_numberOfSignals;
|
2015-10-19 19:22:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-27 18:27:34 +00:00
|
|
|
void Platform_setBindings(Htop_Action* keys);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-27 21:33:37 +00:00
|
|
|
extern MeterClass* Platform_meterTypes[];
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-27 21:44:20 +00:00
|
|
|
int Platform_getUptime();
|
2014-11-27 18:27:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-11-27 22:03:29 +00:00
|
|
|
void Platform_getLoadAverage(double* one, double* five, double* fifteen);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-27 22:18:01 +00:00
|
|
|
int Platform_getMaxPid();
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-16 06:13:42 +00:00
|
|
|
double Platform_setCPUValues(Meter* this, int cpu);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void Platform_setMemoryValues(Meter* this);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void Platform_setSwapValues(Meter* this);
|
2014-11-27 23:07:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-03-16 06:13:42 +00:00
|
|
|
void Platform_setTasksValues(Meter* this);
|
2014-11-27 23:07:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Introduce CLAMP macro. Unify all MIN(MAX(a,b),c) uses.
With the CLAMP macro replacing the combination of MIN and MAX, we will
have at least two advantages:
1. It's more obvious semantically.
2. There are no more mixes of confusing uses like MIN(MAX(a,b),c) and
MAX(MIN(a,b),c) and MIN(a,MAX(b,c)) appearing everywhere. We unify
the 'clamping' with a single macro.
Note that the behavior of this CLAMP macro is different from
the combination `MAX(low,MIN(x,high))`.
* This CLAMP macro expands to two comparisons instead of three from
MAX and MIN combination. In theory, this makes the code slightly
smaller, in case that (low) or (high) or both are computed at
runtime, so that compilers cannot optimize them. (The third
comparison will matter if (low)>(high); see below.)
* CLAMP has a side effect, that if (low)>(high) it will produce weird
results. Unlike MIN & MAX which will force either (low) or (high) to
win. No assertion of ((low)<=(high)) is done in this macro, for now.
This CLAMP macro is implemented like described in glib
<http://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Standard-Macros.html>
and does not handle weird uses like CLAMP(a++, low++, high--) .
2016-01-15 12:26:01 +00:00
|
|
|
char* Platform_getProcessEnv(pid_t pid);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-11-27 18:27:34 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|