Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Antoine Motet 9197adf57e Fix CPU usage on OpenBSD
The current OpenBSD-specific CPU usage code is broken. The `cpu`
parameter of `Platform_setCPUValues` is an integer in the interval
[0, cpuCount], not [0, cpuCount-1]: Actual CPUs are numbered from
1, the “zero” CPU is a “virtual” one which represents the average
of actual CPUs (I guess it’s inherited from Linux’s `/proc/stats`).
This off-by-one error leads to random crashes.

Moreover, the displayed CPU usage is more detailed with system,
user and nice times.

I made the OpenBSD CPU code more similar to the Linux CPU code,
removing a few old bits from OpenBSD’s top(1). I think it will be
easier to understand, maintain and evolve.

I’d love some feedback from experienced OpenBSD people.
2018-12-16 11:30:06 +01:00
Michael McConville b08cb7352e Misc. OpenBSD tuneup and improvement
Including:

 o set *basenameEnd even in error cases (FreeBSD probably needs this)

 o use kvm_openfiles(3) rather than kvm_open(3) so that we can report
   errors (as with FreeBSD)

 o sanify the process argument list creation by using strlcat(3)

 o drop the pageSizeKb variable and use the PAGE_SIZE_KB macro directly,
   as the page size can't change anyway

 o clean up a few macros, add MINIMUM() and MAXIMUM() (should be
   mirrored to FreeBSD)

 o fix some syntax

 o add some useful comments
2016-03-05 23:23:29 -05:00
Explorer09 6dae8108f8 Introduce CLAMP macro. Unify all MIN(MAX(a,b),c) uses.
With the CLAMP macro replacing the combination of MIN and MAX, we will
have at least two advantages:
1. It's more obvious semantically.
2. There are no more mixes of confusing uses like MIN(MAX(a,b),c) and
   MAX(MIN(a,b),c) and MIN(a,MAX(b,c)) appearing everywhere. We unify
   the 'clamping' with a single macro.
Note that the behavior of this CLAMP macro is different from
the combination `MAX(low,MIN(x,high))`.
* This CLAMP macro expands to two comparisons instead of three from
  MAX and MIN combination. In theory, this makes the code slightly
  smaller, in case that (low) or (high) or both are computed at
  runtime, so that compilers cannot optimize them. (The third
  comparison will matter if (low)>(high); see below.)
* CLAMP has a side effect, that if (low)>(high) it will produce weird
  results. Unlike MIN & MAX which will force either (low) or (high) to
  win. No assertion of ((low)<=(high)) is done in this macro, for now.

This CLAMP macro is implemented like described in glib
<http://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Standard-Macros.html>
and does not handle weird uses like CLAMP(a++, low++, high--) .
2016-01-15 20:26:01 +08:00
Michael McConville a9a5a539cf (Very) initial working OpenBSD port 2015-09-18 00:46:48 -04:00