openbsd/OpenBSDProcessList.c:176:56: error: no member named 'ki_pid' in 'struct kinfo_proc'; did you mean 'p_pid'?
const int mib[] = { CTL_KERN, KERN_PROC_CWD, kproc->ki_pid };
^~~~~~
p_pid
/usr/include/sys/sysctl.h:375:10: note: 'p_pid' declared here
int32_t p_pid; /* PID_T: Process identifier. */
^
openbsd/OpenBSDProcessList.c:458:33: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
if (opl->cpus[i].cpuIndex == id)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~
This commit is based on exploratory work by Sohaib Mohamed.
The end goal is two-fold - to support addition of Meters we
build via configuration files for both the PCP platform and
for scripts ( https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/issues/526 )
Here, we focus on generic code and the PCP support. A new
class DynamicMeter is introduced - it uses the special case
'param' field handling that previously was used only by the
CPUMeter, such that every runtime-configured Meter is given
a unique identifier. Unlike with the CPUMeter this is used
internally only. When reading/writing to htoprc instead of
CPU(N) - where N is an integer param (CPU number) - we use
the string name for each meter. For example, if we have a
configuration for a DynamicMeter for some Redis metrics, we
might read and write "Dynamic(redis)". This identifier is
subsequently matched (back) up to the configuration file so
we're able to re-create arbitrary user configurations.
The PCP platform configuration file format is fairly simple.
We expand configs from several directories, including the
users homedir alongside htoprc (below htop/meters/) and also
/etc/pcp/htop/meters. The format will be described via a
new pcp-htop(5) man page, but its basically ini-style and
each Meter has one or more metric expressions associated, as
well as specifications for labels, color and so on via a dot
separated notation for individual metrics within the Meter.
A few initial sample configuration files are provided below
./pcp/meters that give the general idea. The PCP "derived"
metric specification - see pmRegisterDerived(3) - is used
as the syntax for specifying metrics in PCP DynamicMeters.
By default, OpenBSD disables SMT (hyperthreading) cpu pseudo-cores.
This can be changed at runtime by setting the hw.smt sysctl so they
may become active later, therefore they are still present in cpu
stat structures but are marked as offline.
As done with native top(1), this drops them from the cpu summary
graphs.
* Set process data for:
- minflt
- majflt
- processor
- nlwp
* Drop unimplemented nlwp column
* Scan userland threads
* Mark a 'Thread is currently on a CPU.' with 'R', and processes
'Currently runnable' with 'P', do confine with man:ps(1) and Linux.
See https://man.openbsd.org/ps.1
* Show CPU frequency
Generic data, as CPU and memory usage, are used by Meters.
In paused mode they would stop receiving updates and especially Graph
Meters would stop showing continuous data.
Improves: #214Closes: #253
The MIN, MAX, CLAMP, MINIMUM, and MAXIMUM macros appear
throughout the codebase with many re-definitions. Make
a single copy of each in a common header file, and use
the BSD variants of MINIMUM/MAXIMUM due to conflicts in
the system <sys/param.h> headers.
Reasoning:
- implementation was unsound -- broke down when I added a fairly
basic macro definition expanding to a struct initializer in a *.c
file.
- made it way too easy (e.g. via otherwise totally innocuous git
commands) to end up with timestamps such that it always ran
MakeHeader.py but never used its output, leading to overbuild noise
when running what should be a null 'make'.
- but mostly: it's just an awkward way of dealing with C code.
The current OpenBSD-specific CPU usage code is broken. The `cpu`
parameter of `Platform_setCPUValues` is an integer in the interval
[0, cpuCount], not [0, cpuCount-1]: Actual CPUs are numbered from
1, the “zero” CPU is a “virtual” one which represents the average
of actual CPUs (I guess it’s inherited from Linux’s `/proc/stats`).
This off-by-one error leads to random crashes.
Moreover, the displayed CPU usage is more detailed with system,
user and nice times.
I made the OpenBSD CPU code more similar to the Linux CPU code,
removing a few old bits from OpenBSD’s top(1). I think it will be
easier to understand, maintain and evolve.
I’d love some feedback from experienced OpenBSD people.
Including:
o set *basenameEnd even in error cases (FreeBSD probably needs this)
o use kvm_openfiles(3) rather than kvm_open(3) so that we can report
errors (as with FreeBSD)
o sanify the process argument list creation by using strlcat(3)
o drop the pageSizeKb variable and use the PAGE_SIZE_KB macro directly,
as the page size can't change anyway
o clean up a few macros, add MINIMUM() and MAXIMUM() (should be
mirrored to FreeBSD)
o fix some syntax
o add some useful comments
With the CLAMP macro replacing the combination of MIN and MAX, we will
have at least two advantages:
1. It's more obvious semantically.
2. There are no more mixes of confusing uses like MIN(MAX(a,b),c) and
MAX(MIN(a,b),c) and MIN(a,MAX(b,c)) appearing everywhere. We unify
the 'clamping' with a single macro.
Note that the behavior of this CLAMP macro is different from
the combination `MAX(low,MIN(x,high))`.
* This CLAMP macro expands to two comparisons instead of three from
MAX and MIN combination. In theory, this makes the code slightly
smaller, in case that (low) or (high) or both are computed at
runtime, so that compilers cannot optimize them. (The third
comparison will matter if (low)>(high); see below.)
* CLAMP has a side effect, that if (low)>(high) it will produce weird
results. Unlike MIN & MAX which will force either (low) or (high) to
win. No assertion of ((low)<=(high)) is done in this macro, for now.
This CLAMP macro is implemented like described in glib
<http://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Standard-Macros.html>
and does not handle weird uses like CLAMP(a++, low++, high--) .
Christian Göttsche