The PROCESS_MAX_UID_DIGITS=19 introduced in
696f79fe50 doesn't make sense.
The `uid_t` type does not require to be signed in POSIX. If we are to
support 64 bits as the maximum size of `uid_t`, then
PROCESS_MAX_UID_DIGITS should be 20. (= floor(log10(UINT64_MAX)) + 1).
Signed-off-by: Kang-Che Sung <explorer09@gmail.com>
* The size of titleBuffer should be 257 bytes, not 256.
* Remove redundant `static char titleBuffer[]` delarations within
`alignedProcessFieldTitle()` and let the subroutine use one shared
buffer for printing field title. This reduces code size.
Signed-off-by: Kang-Che Sung <explorer09@gmail.com>
Title width of "CPUD%" and "SWAPD%" is 5 and there value cannot go
beyond "100.0%", so increase their field width to 5.
"IOD%" is similar to "MEM%" column, title width is 4 and maximum value
cannot go beyond "100.0%". So in case of "IOD%" column, there is no need
to increase title width to "5". "Process_printPercentage()" function
will handle the maximum value case, it will display value beyond "99.9%"
as "100" instead of "100.0".
Since commit edf319e[1], we're dynamically adjusting column width of
"CPU%", showing single digit precision also for values greater than
"99.9%" makes "CPU%" column consistent with all other values.
[1]: edf319e53d
Change "Process_printPercentage()" function's logic to always display
value (i.e. "val") with single precision. Except when value is greater
than "99.9%" for columns like "MEM%", whose width is fixed to "4" and
value cannot go beyond "100%".
Credits: @Explorer09, thanks for the patch[2] to fix title alignment
issue.
[2]: https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/pull/959#issuecomment-1092480951Closes: #957
This fixes an issus in Hashtable_dump where `"(nil"` is passed as an
argument to `%p` in fprintf. This prints the static address of `"(nil)"`
not "(nil)". This commit changes the code to just pass the NULL pointer
to fprintf, which will consistently print "0x0".
As the "highlight dying processes" option has to keep processes in the
list when they disappear, no code except the cleanup loop in
`ProcessList_scan` should remove processes from the list directly.
Remove the export to prevent random process removals from being
reintroduced accidentally.
If a process goes away while reading its fields, but we already have
that process in the list, we should keep it in case the "highlight dying
processes" mode is active. Not only is that expected in this mode, but
this should also ensure parents are in the list when their children are
(wanted for tree mode consistency).
A process can die between reading the directory listing and opening the
directory FD (if HAVE_OPENAT) or /proc files (otherwise) for reading the
process data. This race would cause LinuxProcessList_recurseProcTree to
remove it from the list immediately, which is unexpected in the
"highlight dying processes" mode and can break the tree structure.
This patch closes this race in the HAVE_OPENAT case by only accessing
the process entry after the directory FD has been opened.
man sscanf(3):
A sequence of white-space characters (space, tab, newline, etc.; see isspace(3)).
This directive matches any amount of white space, including none, in the input.
This commit changes ProcessList_scan to lazily remove Processes by
index, which is known, instead of performing a brute-force search by
pid and immediately reclaiming the lost vector space via compaction.
Searching by pid is potentially quadratic in ProcessList_scan because
the process we are searching for is always at the back of the vector
(the scan starts from the back of the vector). Additionally, removal
via Vector_remove immediately reclaims space (by sliding elements
down).
With these changes process removal in ProcessList_scan is now linear.
Changes:
* ProcessList: add new ProcessList_removeIndex function to remove
by index
* Vector: add Vector_softRemove and Vector_compact functions to
support lazy removal/deletion of entries Vector_softRemove
Vector_compact
* Vector: replace Vector_count with Vector_countEquals since it only
used for consistency assertions.
Coverity scan reports that there is dead code in Settings_write
checking for nulls that have already been dereferenced on every
code path leading to the check. This is likely a hangover from
times when the screens pointer was only conditionally allocated
- they're not needed anymore.
Coverity scan reports there may be a code path that would cause
an overrun in the (relatively new) ScreenSettings code where it
evaluates default sort direction. Add bounds check and default
to descending instead of a potentially invalid array access.
ilyam8